Yggdra Union Pairings (Spoilers), You knew it was coming Options

[Leyviur]

(The essay's a public entry on my LJ if you can bear the flying theories--BE. POLITE. WHEN. YOU. COMMENT. OR. ELSE. you might get banned; I've had a lot of problems with stalkers/flamers there, so there's a zero-tolerance thing for them now...)

Evidently you still have no clue what exactly a stalker is. Allow me to educate your ignorant concepts. Here you go. None of what has happened to you can be considered stalking by definition of U.S. law. If you still need help after this explanation I think your English literacy needs work.

In fact you've come closer to breaking laws than anyone else as you've consistently slandered and defamed numerous people here. I'd quit trying to play the victim if I were you.

Sturm only likes to reread games and anime in fanfic form, and he's so closedminded that he's never, never going to admit that other possibilities work.

You're even more closed minded than Sturm is; you never accept anybody's opinion or critcism and believe yourself to be infallible. You're narcissistic, bigoted, and always think you're right. You victimize yourself and try (in failure, no less) to make everyone else out to be the antagonist when in reality you're the one who most often starts shit.

In short, you're monumentally worse than Sturm. I sort of judge him for taking so much annoyance and harassment from you and not yet banning you because of it. Ironically everything you've done here is more descriptive of stalking than anything that's happened on your Livejournal.

[Raijinili]

I'm pretty sure defamation is a civil thing, not a criminal thing.

And Ash, your relationship with Feral is controlled by hate. How is that better than not trusting the criticism of people who have never given anything but?

[Raijinili]

You're even more closed minded than Sturm is; you never accept anybody's opinion or critcism and believe yourself to be infallible. You're narcissistic, bigoted, and always think you're right. You victimize yourself and try (in failure, no less) to make everyone else out to be the antagonist when in reality you're the one who most often starts shit.

You make it sound as if that group was making good-faith criticisms about her work. AKA You were posting to help her rather than to boost your own self-esteem.

To you, there were only two groups of people who commented on her work: the people who sugar-coated everything, and the people who were honest. But for some reason, the "people who were honest" group happens to be the group that also didn't act friendly towards her. Maybe it's not that the other group isn't being honest enough, but that your group simply hates her and is so blinded by the hate that they don't notice when they go too far.

Edit: Case in point: You don't trust my criticism, because it seems to you that my meaningful interactions with you are only through criticism.

This post has been edited by Raijinili: Apr 28 2007, 10:40 PM

[Suzu Fujibayashi]

I don't sugar-coat anything... <_<
I just like her work. I suppose a more valid 'groups' would be us who like her work and may or may not hold back some criticism, and the other group who loathes her work and rather then suggesting suggestive criticism they flat out choose to insult her and such rather then do something productive.

It's amazing how off-topic things get here. <_<