|
  |
MapleStory, Yeah, I went Sturm. You're my bitch. |
|
|
ChefMKT |
Sep 29 2006, 04:01 AM
|

whoosh
       
Group: Knights
Posts: 606
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Australia
Member No.: 73

|
QUOTE Yes, but Snipers fire slower than Rangers. Of course, with bow booster, a Sniper would just as fast as a Ranger without bow booster, but that would also mean a Ranger using bow booster is faster than a Sniper using it. Also, bomb arrow is better than iron arrow. Of course these only being second job skills, you'll be using them for quite a while before being able to use 3rd job mob skills. Rangers don't suck is all I'm trying to say. ^^
Yes, but at that level, you'll be spamming your skills non-stop so a bow's faster firing speed isn't as important. And no, bomb arrow is not better than iron arrow. Bomb arrows have a 60% chance to stun. That's a 40% chance that the enemy will still charge towards you. With Iron Arrow, the damage dealt is great enough for knock back, which acts as a stun anyway. Okay then, Rangers don't suck. Snipers are just better. It still gets the point across either way.
~~~
|
|
|
|
regruBgniK |
Sep 29 2006, 07:34 PM
|

Metroid Queen
     
Group: Arcs
Posts: 314
Joined: 24-December 05
From: South
Member No.: 14

|
QUOTE(ChefMKT @ Sep 29 2006, 04:01 AM)  QUOTE Yes, but Snipers fire slower than Rangers. Of course, with bow booster, a Sniper would just as fast as a Ranger without bow booster, but that would also mean a Ranger using bow booster is faster than a Sniper using it. Also, bomb arrow is better than iron arrow. Of course these only being second job skills, you'll be using them for quite a while before being able to use 3rd job mob skills. Rangers don't suck is all I'm trying to say. ^^
Yes, but at that level, you'll be spamming your skills non-stop so a bow's faster firing speed isn't as important. And no, bomb arrow is not better than iron arrow. Bomb arrows have a 60% chance to stun. That's a 40% chance that the enemy will still charge towards you. With Iron Arrow, the damage dealt is great enough for knock back, which acts as a stun anyway. Okay then, Rangers don't suck. Snipers are just better. It still gets the point across either way. Stfu. >_> Speed does matter. And crossbows look like little bows on sticks. And Maple's purpose is showing off, so you lose. Stop bashing classes or gtfo my topic Chef. :O
~~~
What goes around... Comes around...
|
|
|
|
Seans |
Oct 4 2006, 07:45 PM
|

Temperance
    
Group: Arcs
Posts: 273
Joined: 2-July 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 157

|
The majority of the MS community who aren't Rangers would agree that Snipers are the better of the two 3rd job classes. However, I disagree with your conclusion about the unnecessity of shooting speed when not shooting continuously, because the shooting speed of the bows / crossbows does not only apply to the speed between each arrow that is shot, but also the time it takes to actually get off a shot.
The case of Rangers vs. Snipers is simply speed versus power, and since speed isn't as important as power is to most people, Snipers are preferred more often. Ice shot, as you mentioned before, is another thing that gives Snipers the slight edge over Rangers. In my honest opinion, if Rangers had ice shot instead of fire shot, a lot more people would be choosing the Ranger path, if not all. :\
That aside, does anyone play on Windia?
~~~
“Every path has its puddleâ€
|
|
|
|
|
  |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Invision Power Board
v2.1.4 © 2025 IPS, Inc.
|