Lacrima Castle
HelpSearchMembersCalendar

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Viacom wins in court case against Youtube, Every single video watched by every single IP on Youtube...
Raij|Away
post Jul 4 2008, 12:16 AM
Post #1


Casual Chatter
**

Group: People Too Lazy to Register
Posts: 72
Joined: 10-July 07
Member No.: 1614



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7488009.stm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
jcdietz03
post Jul 17 2008, 10:40 PM
Post #2


Time Waster
******

Group: Flunkies
Posts: 339
Joined: 1-July 07
From: Boston
Member No.: 1609



QUOTE
You do know that peoples' phone numbers can't be printed without their permission. My home number in the US is not in the phone book.
Not true. It's an opt-out system. They can print your number without your permission. Also, an unlisted number costs extra, at least in some areas.

I don't have a land line though, and it's currently illegal to publish a directory of cell phone customers.

I think the Youtube data Viacom will receive will include "anonymized usernames" - i.e., "User 1", "User 2", "User 3" instead of the real usernames. Your IP won't be included. Viacom wants to prove that commercial content is more popular than user generated content.

I wonder how they will treat derivative works like anime music videos. Do you think Viacom will count it in their figures?

12TB of data is a lot...
According to the judge: "It can fit on four hard drives"
In what universe can 12TB of data fit on four hard drives. It would take a minimum of 8 with the new Seagate 1.5TB drives coming out next month. With current drives it would take 12.

Unless the judge is counting some combination NAS box with four drives in it as a "hard drive" - which is misleading and likely uninformed.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Raij|Away   Viacom wins in court case against Youtube   Jul 4 2008, 12:16 AM
Irysa   This is silly.   Jul 4 2008, 03:25 PM
Rhiannon   I don't recognize IPs as "personally iden...   Jul 4 2008, 03:36 PM
H. Tsukiyono   They could be, though. Given the right know-how yo...   Jul 4 2008, 04:45 PM
Rhiannon   You might be able to find a location or network (I...   Jul 4 2008, 05:51 PM
Yuka   I don't even think this is legal.   Jul 4 2008, 06:42 PM
Rhiannon   Pretty sure it's not. I don't even know ho...   Jul 4 2008, 08:54 PM
Wally   I wonder how much it will cost to check 12 terabyt...   Jul 4 2008, 11:36 PM
Dr Sturm   That's what I'm doing right now. >_...   Jul 5 2008, 01:08 AM
Raijinili   Rhia, some people have static IPs.   Jul 5 2008, 12:19 PM
Rhiannon   Do you know why people on IRC that have dynamic IP...   Jul 5 2008, 05:06 PM
Raijinili   Yes it does. It's possible to identify a perso...   Jul 6 2008, 01:16 AM
Rhiannon   It's possible, but extremely difficult.   Jul 6 2008, 03:09 AM
Dr Sturm   They should assign IPs when IPv6 comes out. And ma...   Jul 7 2008, 12:32 AM
Raijinili   Two computers = two phone lines? Spam? You?   Jul 8 2008, 04:10 AM
Rhiannon   I'm lost.   Jul 8 2008, 06:56 AM
Raijinili   Reasons why his idea is bad.   Jul 10 2008, 12:54 AM
Dr Sturm   I don't understand what you're saying. Or ...   Jul 10 2008, 08:19 PM
Raijinili   People can find your IP and call you.   Jul 12 2008, 07:51 AM
Dr Sturm   IPs are only supposed to be given out on a need-to...   Jul 13 2008, 10:13 PM
Leyviur   IPs are only supposed to be given out on a need-t...   Jul 14 2008, 08:17 PM
Raijinili   So can you call me right now, since I accessed you...   Jul 14 2008, 01:02 PM
Dr Sturm   Yes, but this is misleading - it's not that y...   Jul 15 2008, 08:43 PM
Raijinili   Only if Google's request that they be allowed ...   Jul 24 2008, 05:29 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th September 2025 - 06:41 PM