Well, to be heroic, you must be what-we-call-it a bit crazy or psycho like:
1.The Alamo 2.Anyone remembers Alexander fought with the Persian king? I forget the battle... 3.Battle of the bulge(In this case,not surrender)
And I mean if you fight with a superior force,you can win with good strategy and some high will. Quantity doesn't decide whether you win or lose in battle. It's the strategy,who good at some terrains and sometimes luck. Like this:
1.Napoleon defeated by the Russians because he attacked the Russians when it was nearing the winter and his troops never taste the russian deadly winter while the Russians were already adapted to fight in winter.The Russians also burned down all the warehouses that stored all the food.
2.The Vietnam War: The vietnams won the war because they have extensive networks of tunnels. Tunnels+Ambush=Good!!
Err, I think I forget some of the battles already....
Mizer always a coward boo!! Bounty Hunters always retreat when they saw that they have no more chance to capture/kill the one that have a bounty on his/her head.
But I think future warfare will be more cowardice cause humans use cyborgs and robots to fight each other...Hahaha...Hah! More bloodier and collateral damage everywhere....This sucks. I HATE true wars but games? Hmm, I think about that...
Also,the crazier you are in the battle and WIN,the higher the reputation you get but if you LOSE, heh...your name gonna enter the 10 most stupidest person....Thanks
~~~
 Governance is frickin hard.
|