Advice on defeating Aegina's valk squad in Framm?, How best to do things the hard way Options

[Greyhawk]

Can anyone offer advice on the best way to handle Aegina's group of [High]'d valks that appear on BF15-3? Aside from avoiding them, that is. I'm trying to get as many items as possible and I really want that Golden Wheat thats behind them (not to mention the sword Aegina is carrying).

[Raijinili]

That was following my claim that Rosary and Roswell are best for getting the Wheat - nothing else said because Warp is always better than Horse movement for getting the Wheat.

That's only assuming no restrictions on resources. Which you assumed and Suzu didn't.

I included the condition in my retort.

What condition was that, exactly?

And whenever I said anything it was under the assumption that the long term did not matter. In my very first post proclaiming Rosary and Roswell to be better, I made no mention of a long term because it was irrelevant.

And yet, she was first to post about the best person to get the wheat. You challenged it, she justified her response. You then dismissed the justification with such gems as, "The long term doesn't matter," which is false. The long-term matters sometimes, and she stated that her choice for "best" was affected by long-term decision-making. She was using a long-term condition before you were not.

Justify how the long-term is irrelevant, then. Because you certainly haven't shown why ignoring the long-term makes for better advice.

What "weaker target that I made up?" I continually stated that future battles were irrelevant to my statement.

The weaker target being "Durant is the best for getting the wheat, unconditionally". She never claimed otherwise. Why, then, were you two arguing about whether Durant was the best rather than whether the long-term was irrelevant?

Show me where I ever claimed Suzu said that.

The whole argument was about whether or not Durant was better at getting the wheat. The point should've been settled right away: Rosary and Roswell were better under the short-term, and Durant was better for the long-term. You thus acted as if she was arguing for Durant without conditions. So I assumed you thought there was somewhere where she argued that.