Why do you bother quoting if you're not even responding to the quoted text?
QUOTE
They were THE assumptions because Suzu said that "if (assumptions) are true, then Durant is the best for the job."
That was following my claim that Rosary and Roswell are best for getting the Wheat - nothing else said because Warp is always better than Horse movement for getting the Wheat.
QUOTE
ignoring the fact that Suzu didn't claim that Durant was better at getting the wheat without the conditions, thereby making your argument a Straw Man fallacy
I included the condition in my retort.
QUOTE
Whenever Suzu said that Durant was better at getting the wheat, it was under the conditions that would only apply for the long term.
And whenever I said anything it was under the assumption that the long term did not matter. In my very first post proclaiming Rosary and Roswell to be better, I made no mention of a long term because it was irrelevant.
QUOTE
but you brushed it off and continued attacking a weaker target that you made up.
What "weaker target that I made up?" I continually stated that future battles were irrelevant to my statement.
QUOTE
Show me where Suzu ever said that Durant was the best, without a long-term conditional goal.
Show me where I ever claimed Suzu said that.
Писатель всегда будет в оппозиции к политике, пока сама политика будет в оппозиции к культуре.