 Split From Logic Puzzle, Jerks. |
 | ||||
 |  |  |  |  |
| lilcases |
 May 30 2006, 04:25 AM
Post
#1
|
 nice bs  Group: Flunkies Posts: 402 Joined: 6-April 06 Member No.: 102  |
That is very intersting, but confusing. But it is something to think about.
~~~  |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Raijinili |
May 31 2006, 02:56 PM
Post
#2
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 Lieutenant Group: Gods Posts: 2539 Joined: 25-December 05 Member No.: 16 |
No, but you did repeatedly use the term "create", which implies a concious being.
I wasn't talking about "us". I was talking about the sum of all.
Again, the word "created". Nature does not create a river. Humans create a canal. If you do not assume a creator, then why are you talking about things being created?
First of all, you're using the "it's common sense" argument, which PHAILS. Second, you're not proving me wrong.
Except the topic is to prove my 14-year-old self wrong. And if you can't tie that back to the topic, then you are posting off-topic, which means that it has nothing to do with the topic.
You could say whatever you want. I said something and proved it. There's a difference.
Again, the point of this topic is not to convince anyone one way or another. It's a mental challenge.
The lack of will to learn, to challenge, to see beyond what you can see. This is why you'll never amount to anything but a laborer, Swiyth.
No one has ever bothered to challenge me on this, and no one else that I know of has ever examined this question. So where are there different perspectives? You're just saying that so you can look smart and knowledgable, without having to argue with me.
Name one person who questioned the purpose of everything. And be sure to back it up.
And this is completely off topic. Why are you bringing it up? The ONLY thing I said about proving man's lack of purpose was that it MIGHT be done.
They also find flaws in the proofs of their colleagues. What's your point? If you're saying that someone's proved this wrong before, then lucky you. You can post this disproof and win.
Why must I look at the parts to look at the sum? You said it, now back it up.
Of course something within the whole can affect the whole. I said that it had to affect something outside of itself to matter, and the apple was affecting the other apples and the basket. This isn't proving me wrong.
Yes, if you consider those things to exist.
The whole point of this topic was an exercise in logic. I would be happy if you proved me wrong, because that would mean you learned something.
In your quest to show that you're intelligent, you have shown that you're an idiot. What did I do in my topic post? First, I stated the conclusion. Next, I GAVE THE PROOF. Then I asked people to prove it wrong. Congratulations. You have outsmarted yourself by not paying attention and trying too hard to boost your ego.
Try harder. =============== You can't attack a proof head-on. You have to look for the flaws in the argument, and collapse the argument from within. This post has been edited by Raijinili: May 31 2006, 02:58 PM ~~~  |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posts in this topic
lil'cases Split From Logic Puzzle May 30 2006, 04:25 AM
Swiyth we don't matter cosmically. we don't reall... May 30 2006, 05:38 AM Raijinili You missed my point completely. Good job. May 30 2006, 06:34 AM lightningdude You are looking at things from a logical scientifi... May 30 2006, 06:53 AM Raijinili Basically, you're trying to look smart while h... May 31 2006, 01:29 AM Shadow I admit that things like this are confusing... But... May 31 2006, 02:50 AM Raijinili
Try proving that, and we'll talk.
Go make yo... May 31 2006, 03:04 AM Shadow I never said "god" in my post.
I may bel... May 31 2006, 03:13 AM whoyodaddy i think i lost a few brain cells trying to figure ... May 31 2006, 03:32 AM Swiyth Rai has successfully confused you all. oh well. i... May 31 2006, 06:18 AM lightningdude I do understand what you are saying. As I said, th... May 31 2006, 08:17 AM lightningdude Oh, and if you can trash my thoughts and decide th... May 31 2006, 08:34 AM S. S. Wilkins I think pure logic proved him right...
Debating i... May 31 2006, 10:38 AM Shadow
I'm just using "us" as an example,... May 31 2006, 04:08 PM Swiyth sadly, i'm not known for my intelligence. hmm.... May 31 2006, 04:47 PM Shadow
That's exactly what I think.
But the idea o... May 31 2006, 05:33 PM Raijinili
I'm just using "us" as an example, ... Jun 1 2006, 12:17 AM Shadow
I may believe that somebody created us. But not... Jun 1 2006, 02:25 AM Raijinili Because I didn't know what you were exactly re... Jun 1 2006, 03:14 AM lightningdude
The Definition of Purpose: What something is use... Jun 1 2006, 08:16 AM Raijinili
I challenge this statement. Potential is not the... Jun 1 2006, 09:05 AM Shadow
To be honest I never tried to prove you wrong. I... Jun 1 2006, 04:38 PM Dr Sturm Then you posted against the purpose of the topic. Jun 1 2006, 04:39 PM Shadow
nor you. Jun 1 2006, 04:42 PM Dr Sturm No, because, while I did not do what he asked, wha... Jun 1 2006, 04:49 PM Shadow Still, what you posted is against the prupose of t... Jun 1 2006, 05:05 PM Raijinili He clarified my first post, so it would be easier ... Jun 1 2006, 05:09 PM Dr Sturm The title and the purpose of the topic are not alw... Jun 1 2006, 05:10 PM lightningdude
Oh, now you're making up definitions. ... Jun 1 2006, 05:16 PM Shadow
The fact of someone creating a topic with a titl... Jun 1 2006, 05:27 PM Raijinili
So you're saying that all non-concious things... Jun 1 2006, 06:09 PM Raijinili
No, you're less intelligent because you can... Jun 1 2006, 06:15 PM Shadow
Stop answering my posts then. Ignore them and I ... Jun 1 2006, 07:54 PM Raijinili
Good job. I'm glad you figured that out. Un... Jun 1 2006, 09:41 PM Shadow You called me jerk, idiot, stupid and ignorant. Wo... Jun 1 2006, 10:13 PM Chaos Seraph I actually don't think you're going to fin... Jun 1 2006, 11:45 PM Raijinili
Descartes's proof:
If I think, then I exist.
... Jun 2 2006, 03:55 AM lightningdude
No, that's actually what he told me.
May I ... Jun 2 2006, 07:32 AM Raijinili
I didn't say it as an assumption. I gave a P... Jun 3 2006, 01:11 AM lightningdude Let me expand on my question. If something exists,... Jun 3 2006, 06:52 AM Dr Sturm There's no limit on space. The Universe contin... Jun 3 2006, 03:20 PM lightningdude How has that been tested? Anyway, just because the... Jun 3 2006, 04:49 PM Raijinili Let me expand on my question. If something exists,... Jun 4 2006, 02:40 AM lightningdude First of all, if the bubbles of existence thing is... Jun 4 2006, 06:31 AM Raijinili
Actually, I'm not doing any such thing. I wa... Jun 5 2006, 03:01 PM lightningdude This is kinda like a question:
As one who believe... Jun 6 2006, 07:06 AM Leyviur This entire argument has no purpose.
Ha HA! Jun 6 2006, 03:01 PM Swiyth funny you should pop by. do you have any tips?
ex... Jun 6 2006, 07:16 PM Raijinili
You're posting off-topic again. Stop it.
Al... Jun 6 2006, 11:56 PM Chaos Seraph
And why are spoken statements any better?Wrong wo... Jun 7 2006, 01:25 AM Swiyth
Descartes's proof:
If I think, then I exist.
... Jun 7 2006, 04:14 AM Raijinili
But proofs are just statements that this person... Jun 7 2006, 06:22 AM lightningdude
You're posting off-topic again. Stop it.
Al... Jun 7 2006, 07:52 AM Dr Sturm
You are way fucking off heere. I don't know h... Jun 7 2006, 08:47 AM lightningdude I understand, but I was referring to Rai and what ... Jun 7 2006, 09:01 AM
Raijinili
If God affects you, you're likely to act diff... Jun 13 2006, 09:29 AM |
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th November 2025 - 01:38 PM |
Invision Power Board
v2.1.4 © 2025 IPS, Inc.