Um, no. You really don't.
Yeah, good job with that. Now you're a hypocrite and a moron.

And that's a direct insult, if you want it to be. You can choose to respond apathetically, in kind, or not at all. I would tend to option D: In a way that's humorous, but not inflammatory. In my opinion, trying to make yourself look apathetic is extremely lame. A flame war has the premise that the person who can best insult the other is the winner. Yes, this is who we want to look up to. This is what we want to breed into our children.

I don't insult people for fun, so think about that before you make your decision.
I would like to ask, how many people actually viewed Xel as the bad guy after my post?

We all know Sturm and Ash aren't the nicest people, and most of the regulars, I hope, know me better than to judge someone based on whether or not I contradict them. Actually, the fact that Sturm is arguing with you hurts your social standing more than anything I would say.

This post has been edited by Raijinili: Aug 12 2007, 07:44 AM

In a 1 on 1 without any weapons, Ein would win because he's hotter than Milanor.

That is the most truthful thing said in this topic.

I'm going with the general consensus, although I was totally thinking Fire Emblem instead of Riviera and Yggdra Union when I thought "weapons triad." Milanor's at a weapon disadvantage to begin with, factor in Ein's Grim Angel strength and the thief's odds don't look so good.

... Although I don't know how aesthetic appeal has anything to do with who'd win a fight. Ein would still definitely win in unarmed combat, but I would think it wouldn't be from the looks department. >>



This post has been edited by H. Tsukiyono: Aug 12 2007, 08:53 AM

-Dusty

... Yeah. Ein wins, for sure. xD Poor thief. That must really damage his morale, eh?

So what's your point? You want me to apologize for Sturm's ignorance? I don't want flame wars; I asked Sturm to quit the topic if he couldn't argue without insulting. In my opinion, you're the one who is trying to make a flame war here over an argumentum ad hominem Sturm did to me.
I would like to ask if you could say those things do Sturm too, to avoid this kind of situation.


Neither do I.


I suppose you're trying to tell me that I'm the one who's wrong here. However, Sturm was wrong too, and it seens you want to make him the victim.


I don't care if you think Sturm's opinion is absolute, but we had divergent opinions and we ended up in a discussion. I just wanted to debate.

We speak English, not Latin or whatever that is.



At the time, Sturm was not in the wrong. He was the admin back then, and that grants him supremacy.



Hurhur.

Oh my.....looks like they gonna be a fight soon...(packs up).Anyways I don't want to join it. Hey!! How about Old Ein (60 above) fights normal Milanor?? Who will win?? Old vs Young. Discuss.Dunno cause plausible for Ein to knock Milanor AGAIN or Milanor can FINALLY beat old Ein.

"Argument to a man". Sorry, but that is an expression I got used to say.

Is this Old Ein you speak of in Angelic years or human years?

This is, of course, assuming that their years are measured differently.

Well to be more realistic,I choose human years.

To be more realistic, you have to erase the existance of angels.

So... then Milanor would win by default because Ein would be a nonexistent entity?

You'd also have to eliminate the existance of axe-weilding stray bandit kings.