Yay for necroposting. And so Strum won't like, shot me or something for posting in a different topic about this.

But I'm saying Ursula and Seth are indeed female and not genderless. Yes Ursula is more of a spirit but she has a physical body. She was a living person whom died and she's now a spirit.

So unless dying somehow makes you genderless, Ursula is quite female. And Seth is female since Seth is her opposite. Spirit or no spirit, I'm saying they are females.

Your explanation on Seth being female makes no sense.

Ursula was not a living spirit. I said read the thread before posting.

Wouldn't that make Seth a guy?

I didn't say she was a living spirit, I said she used to be a living person. I do believe Hector mentioned that. Just to be safe.



And I guess that although Seth is Ursula's opposite I guess they are only opposite's in their beliefs and such. I mean, they are almost one in the same in a sense since one cannot exist without the other and stuff.

Yeah, typo, figure it out; I didn't call you on yours.

Hector mentioned a lot of things. How trustable was Hector, again?

Again, read through the entire thread, because we've already been through this.

*facepalmsigh*

Well, I guess he is trustworthy in anything not related to the whole Retribution thing... <.<
But on just about everything else well...

And really, if he lied about Ursula's very vague past, what does he have to gain from it? He strikes me as the kind of guy who only lies if it benefits him.

... Because if Ursula dies, Ursula being the protector of Riviera, then no one is left to protect Riviera. Meaning he can do with it what he pleases. Do you think the Grim Angels would be so quick to kill Ursula knowing her to be the protector of Riviera left behind by the Gods?

Just in case.

Where in the hell did you get that idea?
Defenseless without is not the same as invincible with.

I just assumed that, I mean...


But this little 'argument' is pretty pointless isn't it? I mean, unless Sting themselves say Ursula or Seth isn't a female no one in the world is going to make me think otherwise.

Yeah, making someone easier to kill is completely pointless.

If it looks like a woman, walks like a woman, and talks like a woman, then chances are; it's a woman.

Although I do agree with Sturm about what classifies ones sex. But still, they look and dress like women, I think it's safe to say that they're "woman-like" I mean they took on the form of a living creature, and living creatures have genders. So at the very least, they are assuming females in their own minds.

With the exception of Seth-ra, I don't know what the hell that thing is, I'll cooperate and say genderless until someone can prove otherwise.

Ledah would.


She floats. XD

There are also chances that it isn't. You shouldn't believe what you hear and say automatically.



Ursula is hardly wearing anything, except bandages. Unless you call that dressing up as "woman-like."



A living creature and a spirit taking a form that looks like a female are not the same thing. Also, a living creature would have to be able to reproduce and as Sturm mentioned WAY earlier in the thread, neither Seth or Ursula do.

This post has been edited by ChefMKT: Mar 18 2007, 12:34 PM

Did you read the whole "left behind by the Gods" bit? That would be betraying the Gods.

http://www.grev.co.jp/ronde360/char_p03.html



GUESS WHAT EVEN THOUGH IT HAS THE MOST FEMININE VOICE IN THE GAME AND LOOKS LIKE THAT, IT'S A SIXTEEN-YEAR-OLD MALE
I could very easily find other so-called "traps" if you want.