Lacrima Castle
HelpSearchMembersCalendar

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Math problem 83 or something, Real mathematicians can't count
Raijinili
post Feb 2 2008, 06:21 AM
Post #1


Lieutenant
*************

Group: Gods
Posts: 2539
Joined: 25-December 05
Member No.: 16



Say that when you take pistachios, you take ten per handful, you eat the unshelled ones, take off the shells of the shelled ones, and drop the newly unshelled ones back into the bowl.
If you had a bowl of 100 shelled pistachios, how many grabs would it take to eat them all?


~~~
IPB Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Elnendil
post May 1 2010, 03:39 AM
Post #2


Talkative
****

Group: Arcs
Posts: 154
Joined: 23-December 05
From: DEM STATES
Member No.: 6



Isn't there an equation for this? I'll see if I can figure it out.

First scoop, there is a 100% chance of getting 10 unshelled. Second scoop there's a 1900/99% chance of getting a pistachio for each pistachio out of ten. Hmm.

Also:

QUOTE
There's no end


Yes, there is. There is a finite amount of pistachios in the bowl. That means there is a finite amount of scoops to get them all out if eat at least one. With each scoop afterwards up to a finite point, you are eating either 0 or 10, and you are either unshelling 0 or 10, which add up to the unshelled number.

I would say 20 just by looking at it, but maybe thats the "trick". If one were to luckily get all shelled first, then unshelled, with 10 in hand, it would take 10 turns both times. And if one were to always repick the same unshelled pistachios (as in failure to acquire new shelled pistachios every other pick), it would also end up to be 20 as you would take one scoop to unshell, and one scoop to eat. Which would be the opposite results of each other. This should hold up to multiple bowls, by the way. As in, if you were to split the bowls into ten bowls, it would still take 20, since each bowl you would take all of them and unshell all of them, since pulling them apart and putting them together equals the same thing (For example, 296x90 = (200+90+6)(90) (26640 = 18000+8100+540) (or (100)=(10)(10)).

If that isn't the answer, why don't you post it later so I learn something. I've always been the person who was rusty on the basics but knowedgeable on complex shit. Thats generally how math majors should take the field anyways. Thats why most public school books have the answers in the back. Its so if you get the wrong answer, you can recheck your work to see where you slipped up. Use it all the time.

This post has been edited by Elnendil: May 1 2010, 03:55 AM


~~~
QUOTE
Kenji: Where else would I could get beaten with a phone that would make me unable to remember it? The ass?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Raijinili   Math problem 83 or something   Feb 2 2008, 06:21 AM
jcdietz03   after thinking about this for a bit... isn't ...   Feb 2 2008, 02:02 PM
regruBgniK   Who eats pistachios without the shell?   Feb 2 2008, 04:47 PM
Raijinili   An example isn't a proof.   Feb 2 2008, 10:16 PM
jcdietz03   An example isn't a proof.It's been too lo...   Feb 2 2008, 11:17 PM
Raijinili   It's not true that there will be less than 10 ...   Feb 3 2008, 09:05 PM
jcdietz03   It is true. I meant to say "less than or equ...   Feb 3 2008, 09:45 PM
Raijinili   I'm the one asking the question here. It's...   Feb 8 2008, 11:53 PM
jcdietz03   This is your claim: It's not true that there w...   Feb 10 2008, 12:56 AM
Raij|Away   That's right. The < vs <= is a technica...   Feb 11 2008, 12:27 PM
DustyHaru   Is that shelled, the past participle of 'to sh...   Mar 26 2008, 07:29 PM
Raijinili   Shelled as in opposed to unshelled. I also specifi...   Mar 27 2008, 05:02 AM
Wally   No one eats pistachios like that. The question is...   Mar 27 2008, 10:09 PM
Raijinili   you moot   Mar 29 2008, 03:16 AM
DustyHaru   BORED Is it least number of grabs or most number ...   Mar 2 2010, 12:49 AM
aerozero   Use the Tootsie Roll Pop Owl Method.   Mar 2 2010, 01:35 AM
DustyHaru   "Due to the laws of probablity it could be an...   Mar 2 2010, 01:57 AM
Yuka   You have no way of dictating how many shelled and ...   Mar 2 2010, 05:23 PM
Lloyd Seegymont the Rasier   42.   Mar 2 2010, 05:38 PM
Raij|Away   If there are less than ten, you grab that many. I...   Mar 5 2010, 12:10 AM
H. Tsukiyono   Somewhere between 12 and 21 grabs. :V   Mar 15 2010, 05:52 PM
DustyHaru   You need at least 20 grabs, since you pick up each...   Mar 15 2010, 06:08 PM
H. Tsukiyono   I feel rather silly now. I diagrammed it wrong :V....   Mar 15 2010, 08:28 PM
Shiokazu   who fucking cares? the important thing is eating t...   May 1 2010, 12:10 AM
Raijinili   Every time I come back to this topic, I think, ...   May 1 2010, 11:20 PM
Elnendil   Every time I come back to this topic, I think, ...   May 2 2010, 01:43 AM
Shiokazu   math is not meant for me, bring something easier. ...   May 2 2010, 12:35 AM
Raijinili   You just missed the in-between case. In a case-by-...   May 5 2010, 03:15 AM
Elnendil   I'll keep that in mind.   May 6 2010, 03:31 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th January 2025 - 08:04 PM